Original Article
Radiation Exposure to Physicians
during Interventional Radiologic Procedures : Evaluation for
Neuroembolization, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, and Hepatic
Infusion Catheter Implantation
Department of Radiology, Teikyo University
School of Medicine
Shigeru Suzuki, Shigeru Furui
Department of Environmental Health, National Institute of
Public Health
Ichiro Yamaguchi
Department of Radiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine
Masatoshi Okazaki
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Faculty of Medicine
Hironobu Nakamura
Department of Radiology, Kohka Public Hospital
Tsutomu Sakamoto
Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University
Tsuneo Ishiguchi
Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine
Takaaki Isshiki
Department of Radiology, Toranomon Hospital
Hidenori Takebe
Department of Radiological Technology, Saitama Cancer Center
Kunihiko Morozumi
Department of Radiology, Teikyo University Hospital
Masafumi Yamagishi
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital
Kazuya Yamaguchi
Department of Radiology, Fukuoka University Hospital
Kunihiro Matsumoto
Abstract
Purpose : We evaluated radiation exposure to physicians during
three kinds of interventional radiology procedures.
Material and Methods : Doses were assessed for 32 procedures(12
neuroembolizations, 11 percutaneous coronary interventions [PCI],
and 9 hepatic infusion catheter implantations) at four institutes.
Skin doses and effective doses were evaluated with thermoluminescent
dosimeters at the physician’s chest inside and outside a protector,
glabella, and finger. The ratios of glabella dose and finger
dose to chest dose outside the protector were compared among
the three kinds of procedures.
Result : In neuroembolization, effective dose was 0.04±0.03
mSv, and doses were 0.14±0.18 mSv at the finger, and 0.16±0.18
mSv at the glabella. In PCI, effective dose was 0.04±0.05 mSv,
and doses were 0.48±1.74 mSv at the finger, and 0.20±0.30 mSv
at the glabella. In hepatic infusion catheter implantation, effective
dose was 0.04 ±0.03 mSv, and doses were 0.22±0.14 mSv at the
finger, and 0.08±0.06 mSv at the glabella. The relative glabella
dose in neuroembolization was larger than in hepatic infusion
catheter implantation(p<0.05), and the relative finger dose
in hepatic infusion catheter implant was larger than in PCI(p<0.001).
Conclusions : The doses for physicians in these procedures
were thought to be acceptable in general. Occupational radiation
exposure in interventional radiology is thought to be affected
by the kind of procedure performed. Therefore, it is necessary
to assess it, and take measures to reduce it for procedures that
may involve extended fluoroscopy time.
Key words
●Interventional Radiology
●Occupational exposure
●Thermoluminescent dosimeter
|